4.9★★★★★587 Google reviews

Drug Trafficking Lawyer in Greensboro, NC

Trafficking in North Carolina is decided by weight, not by whether anything was sold. The weight fixes the class, the minimum and the maximum, and your record does not change any of them. If someone is charged, the first two weeks matter more than they will ever matter again.

Free consultation24/7 live answeringState and federal courtGuilford County courts

What is the charge?

Read us the substance and the weight from the paperwork, and tell us whether anyone is in custody.

    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

    Sending this form does not make us your lawyer yet.

    The short version

    1. No sale is required. G.S. 90-95(h) reaches anyone who "sells, manufactures, delivers, transports, or possesses" the threshold weight. Possession alone completes the offense. There is no intent to sell element.

    2. The mixture is weighed, not the drug. The statute counts "any mixture containing such substance". That is why the weight on the charging paperwork and the weight you would expect are often different.

    3. Your prior record does not change the number. A first offender and someone with a long record face the same mandatory sentence for the same weight. Trafficking sits outside the structured sentencing grid.

    4. There are exactly two ways below the minimum, and both are findings the judge has to enter. Neither is automatic and neither is a promise. They are set out below.

    The weight thresholds

    All figures below are read off G.S. 90-95(h). The terms are mandatory, stated in the statute itself rather than taken from a sentencing chart.

    Cocaine

    Weight Class Mandatory term Fine
    28 g or more, less than 200 g G 35 to 51 months not less than $50,000
    200 g or more, less than 400 g F 70 to 93 months not less than $100,000
    400 g or more D 175 to 222 months at least $250,000

    Methamphetamine

    Weight Class Mandatory term Fine
    28 g or more, less than 200 g F 70 to 93 months not less than $50,000
    200 g or more, less than 400 g E 90 to 120 months not less than $100,000
    400 g or more C 225 to 282 months at least $250,000

    Amphetamine is not methamphetamine, and the gap is large. At the same 28 gram entry tier, amphetamine is a Class H felony at 25 to 39 months, while methamphetamine is a Class F at 70 to 93 months. Competitor pages routinely merge the two, and they also cite the repealed subdivision for amphetamine.

    Opium, opiates, opioids and heroin

    Weight Class Mandatory term Fine
    4 g or more, less than 14 g F 70 to 93 months $500,000 for heroin, otherwise not less than $50,000
    14 g or more, less than 28 g E 90 to 120 months $750,000 for heroin, otherwise not less than $100,000
    28 g or more C 225 to 282 months $1,000,000 for heroin, otherwise not less than $500,000

    Fentanyl and carfentanil

    Weight Class Mandatory term Fine
    4 g or more, less than 14 g E 90 to 120 months $500,000
    14 g or more, less than 28 g D 175 to 222 months $750,000
    28 g or more C 225 to 282 months $1,000,000

    Marijuana

    Weight Class Mandatory term Fine
    In excess of 10 lb, less than 50 lb H 25 to 39 months not less than $5,000
    50 lb or more, less than 2,000 lb G 35 to 51 months not less than $25,000
    2,000 lb or more, less than 10,000 lb F 70 to 93 months not less than $50,000
    10,000 lb or more D 175 to 222 months not less than $200,000

    Note the wording. The statute says “in excess of 10 pounds”. Exactly ten pounds is not trafficking.

    LSD, MDMA and MDA, methaqualone, synthetic cannabinoids and substituted cathinones each have their own tiers in the same subsection. If yours is one of those, read us the weight and we will tell you the tier.

    What changed for fentanyl in December 2025

    This is the single most important recent change, and most pages in this state have not caught up with it.

    Fentanyl and carfentanil used to be sentenced inside the opium and heroin tier. Session Law 2025-70 pulled them out into a new subdivision of their own, effective for offenses committed on or after 1 December 2025.

    The effect at the entry tier is a full class. Four grams of fentanyl was a Class F felony at 70 to 93 months. It is now a Class E felony at 90 to 120 months, with a flat $500,000 fine rather than a minimum. The same act made simple possession of fentanyl or carfentanil a Class H felony.

    The date on your charge decides which version applies. Conduct before 1 December 2025 is governed by the old rates. Any page reproducing the pre-2025 fentanyl table is now wrong by an entire felony class.

    Why probation is off the table

    G.S. 90-95(h)(5) is blunt about it: except as provided in that subdivision or in the one that follows, a person being sentenced under this subsection may not receive a suspended sentence or be placed on probation.

    Three further points follow from the statute and they are usually left out:

    • Prior record level does not apply. Subsection (h) applies “notwithstanding any other provision of law”, and each tier states its own minimum and maximum. Structured sentencing gives way where another statute sets the term.
    • Extraordinary mitigation is barred by name. G.S. 15A-1340.13(h) excludes drug trafficking and trafficking conspiracy from the relief that is otherwise available in an active-only cell.
    • Trafficking sentences run consecutively. Under subdivision (h)(6) a sentence imposed under this subsection runs consecutively with, and begins at the expiration of, any sentence already being served.

    Is someone in custody right now?

    Trafficking charges carry conditions that are set high and early. Read us the substance and the weight and we will tell you what tier it is and what happens next.

    Call (336) 379-0539Free consultation, answered 24/7

    The two ways below the minimum

    Substantial assistance

    Under subdivision (h)(5) the sentencing judge may reduce the fine, impose a term below the minimum, or suspend the term and order probation, where the person has “to the best of the person’s knowledge” provided substantial assistance in the identification, arrest or conviction of accomplices, accessories, co-conspirators or principals, and the judge enters a finding of that assistance in the record.

    Read it carefully, because this paragraph is overstated more often than any other in North Carolina drug law:

    • It is discretionary. The word is may, not shall. Established assistance does not compel relief.
    • It needs a finding on the record. No finding, no relief.
    • The statute names no moving party. This is the judge’s own power. There is no prosecutor’s motion requirement, unlike the federal system, where a government motion is required. People arrive expecting the federal rule and it does not apply here.
    • Nothing is guaranteed. The statute sets no floor, no formula and no entitlement, and it does not require that a conviction result.

    The protective words are worth knowing: “to the best of the person’s knowledge” means telling everything you know can count even where it turns out not to be useful. What you say in that conversation, and when, is a decision to make with a lawyer and not before.

    The eleven findings route

    Subdivision (h)(5a) lets a judge reduce the fine and sentence on the ordinary grid instead, but only after a hearing where the District Attorney can present evidence, and only on record findings that all eleven listed conditions are met. They include accepted responsibility, no prior felony conviction under this statute, no violence or weapon, an admitted substance use disorder and completion of a court-approved treatment program, that the mandatory minimum would be a substantial injustice and is not necessary to protect the public, that the person is being sentenced solely for trafficking by possession, and that the quantity is not greater than the lowest category for that substance.

    That last condition is the one that closes the door for most people. If you are above the entry tier, this route is unavailable and substantial assistance is the only one left.

    Conspiracy carries the same sentence

    G.S. 90-95(i) is one sentence and it surprises people: the penalties in subsection (h) “shall also apply to any person who is convicted of conspiracy to commit any of the offenses described in subsection (h)”.

    Conspiracy to traffic is not a class lower, and it is not sentenced on the grid. Same class, same mandatory minimum and maximum, same fine as the completed offense. Someone who never touched the substance can face the identical number.

    How these cases are actually defended

    Because the weight fixes the sentence, the defense is almost never an argument about what the sentence should be. It is an argument about the evidence.

    • The stop and the search. Most trafficking cases begin with a vehicle stop or a warrant. If the evidence came in unlawfully, a motion to suppress ends the case rather than improving it.
    • Knowing possession. The State has to prove the possession was knowing. In a shared car, a package, or a house with several occupants, that is frequently the whole case. This is the live defense in most trafficking by possession charges, because the statute does not allow an intent to sell argument.
    • The weight itself. What was weighed, how, and whether the laboratory confirms the charging figure. A tier boundary can be a few grams.
    • The identity of the substance. A laboratory question with its own timelines, and not a formality.
    • The date of the offense, for any fentanyl charge straddling 1 December 2025.

    State or federal

    The same conduct can be charged in the Middle District of North Carolina, which sits in Greensboro. Federal trafficking runs on its own sentencing system with its own mandatory minimums and no parole, and the route across is often a firearm found alongside the substance.

    If federal agents have made contact and no charge has been filed, that is the point of maximum influence on the case. See federal criminal defense and firearm with drugs.

    Related: drug charges overview · drug possession · possession with intent to sell · maintaining a dwelling

    How to choose a drug trafficking lawyer in Greensboro

    No lawyer in North Carolina is permitted to advertise as the best, and a firm
    that does is telling you something about how it reads the rules. The State Bar
    treats self-laudatory claims as a compliance problem, not a selling point.

    So judge on answers instead. Every question below has an exact answer. A firm
    that handles these cases every week will give you one on the phone, for free, in
    a few minutes. A firm that gives you a brochure answer is telling you something too.

    1. What weight tier am I in, and how close to the line is it?
      The tier fixes the class, the minimum and the maximum. A few grams can be a whole class, so the weight on the lab report is worth more attention than almost anything else.
    2. Is the weight the substance, or the mixture?
      The statute counts the mixture. Ask what was actually weighed and whether the lab has confirmed it, because the charging weight and the lab weight are not always the same.
    3. Do my priors change the number?
      No, and a firm that says otherwise has not read the statute. The trafficking sentence is fixed by weight. Prior record enters only through one narrow provision.
    4. Is this charged as possession, or as sale and delivery?
      It matters, because one of the two statutory exits is limited to people sentenced solely for trafficking by possession.
    5. Was the search lawful?
      Most trafficking cases are won on the stop, the search or the question of knowing possession, not on the weight.

    Ask us the same questions. (336) 379-0539.

    Your attorney

    Jason Aycoth, criminal defense attorney, Greensboro NC
    Partner

    Jason Aycoth

    Drug Trafficking · Federal Drug Cases · Suppression Motions

    Jason handles criminal cases in state and federal court across North Carolina. He has served as Editor of the True Bill and was Commencement Speaker at Elon Law School's graduation.

    • Former President, Greensboro Criminal Defense Lawyers Association
    • Elected member, Criminal Justice Section, North Carolina Bar Association
    • Selected to present the Wade M. Smith Award for Top Criminal Defense Lawyer in North Carolina

    Read Jason's full profile →

    What clients say

    4.9 out of 5 from 587 Google reviews. A few recent ones:

    Thai Nguyen profile picture
    Thai Nguyen
    1 week ago
    i had a warrant on me, call this law firm Mr. Jason Aycoth, and the first time i spoke to him, he just make me feel at ease. Super friendly, down to earth and made me feel comfortable. No matter what happen i know he will fight for me with everythings he got. if you need help this is the one you want. . love this law firm. THE BEST
    Autry Hinton profile picture
    Autry Hinton
    2 weeks ago
    If I could give more stars I would! Greatest lawyer around, some might even say he’s a magician. Thank you Mr aycoth for your amazing services.
    Char Frazier profile picture
    Char Frazier
    2 weeks ago
    Fantastic service from the very first call to the end
    Ven Jonn profile picture
    Ven Jonn
    2 weeks ago
    We can’t thank Jason Aycoth and Samantha Hepler enough for the help with our daughter’s case. From our first call with Jason Aycoth, they were professional, honest, and clear about what to expect. They answered our questions promptly, explained every step in plain language, and were well prepared at every stage. It was a stressful time for our family, and both Jason Aycoth and Samantha Hepler were calm, compassionate, and reassuring throughout. We’re grateful the case was dismissed and highly recommend Garrett, Walker, Aycoth & Olson Law Firm to anyone who needs help.
    Abdullah 65 profile picture
    Abdullah 65
    3 weeks ago
    Morgan Faries was professional, helpful, and supportive throughout my case. She explained everything clearly and made me feel comfortable during a difficult time. I truly appreciate all her help and highly recommend Morgan Faries.
    Judy Rocom profile picture
    Judy Rocom
    2 months ago
    Five stars isn't enough. Patrick Bidwell is exceptional! He answered every question and concerns I had, and Patrick had told me he was going to try and get me out of court quickly and not even 15 minutes later, the case was dismissed and I was out. I truly enjoyed having him represent me and working with him. I can't recommend Attorney Patrick Bidwell enough!
    tracertevin profile picture
    tracertevin
    3 months ago
    I can't recommend Stephanie Goldsbourgh highly enough. From the very beginning, she treated me with respect, honesty, and professionalism during one of the most difficult periods of my life. I was facing very serious criminal charges, and the uncertainty was overwhelming. Stephanie never made promises she couldn't keep, but she always kept me informed, answered my questions with patience, and helped me understand every step of the legal process. What stood out most was her calm, focused approach. While I was dealing with the emotional weight of my case, she remained grounded in the facts and worked diligently on my behalf. I always felt like she genuinely cared about my future and never treated me like just another client. Thanks to her hard work and dedication, my case was ultimately dismissed. I will always be grateful for the guidance, professionalism, and integrity she showed throughout the entire process. If you're looking for an attorney who is knowledgeable, honest, compassionate, and committed to her clients, I wholeheartedly recommend Stephanie. Thank you for everything you did for me.
    Evelyn Torres profile picture
    Evelyn Torres
    3 months ago
    Morgan A. Faries is everything you could ask for in an attorney. From day one, she made us feel like we weren’t just another case. She genuinely cared about what our family was going through and always took the time to listen, understand our situation, and answer every question we had. Morgan is incredibly intelligent, knowledgeable, and knows exactly what she’s doing. At the same time, she’s compassionate, approachable, and easy to talk to. During one of the most stressful times for our family, she made us feel supported every step of the way. We always felt like she had our back and wasn’t afraid to fight for us. She kept us informed throughout the entire process, explained everything clearly, and made sure we knew what to expect. Her professionalism, attention to detail, and genuine care gave us so much peace of mind. Thanks to Morgan’s hard work and dedication, we achieved the best possible outcome for our family, and we will always be grateful for everything she did for us. Thank you, Morgan, for standing by our side when we needed it most. You truly made a difference in our lives. We wholeheartedly recommend Morgan A. Faries to anyone looking for an attorney who will genuinely care, listen, and fight tirelessly on your behalf.
    Cindy Scandrett profile picture
    Cindy Scandrett
    4 months ago
    We have used Garrett, Walker, Aycoth & Olson twice for 2 different civil litigation cases. The attorney who represented my sister-in-law, Ryan Denver, handled both cases with professionalism and respect. We were constantly updated in the process. Mr. Denver was very compassionate and caring as he negotiated a very acceptable settlement and even secured a dismissal in one of the cases. I would recommend this lawfirm without hesitation.
    Maddy L profile picture
    Maddy L
    4 months ago
    Morgan Faries is absolutely an amazing woman, and lawyer. The respect, and the time to actually listen and hear you is astonishing. She made me feel so comfortable, and heard every word of mine even though I naturally have a very soft voice. That doesn't happen very often. The silent confidence she had was admirable. She took into account what was best for me and did everything she could to have the case ruled in my favor, even if it was agreeing to a settlement that still had the avenue I needed. This avoided the mental load that was definitely going to come of the trial. She actually cared about the person I was and the situation I was going through. Her only interest was hearing me, and actually understanding. Morgan Faries is extremely intelligent especially how she holds herself. I am very grateful I had her by my side to work through the legal system. I could not have done this without her. I do not write reviews often but this law firm and attorney Morgan Faries deserves an honest review of my experience and it was everything I had hoped when I secured them for help. Thank you again, Morgan Faries and Garrett, Walker, Aycoth and Olsen, Attorneys at Law.
    Karen Williams profile picture
    Karen Williams
    4 years ago
    If you find yourself in need of an attorney I would highly recommend Hilary Hux! She and her entire team (Casey Robinson, Kristen Reese) were an absolute pleasure to work with from start to finish. They were always very attentive to my needs and always responded to any question or concern I had in a timely manner. The sincerity they displayed while handling my divorce case made a difficult time in my life more bearable knowing I had them on my side. Simply put they are a genuine group of people that do the absolute best job they can for their clients and words can't express how thankful I am to have had the experience to work with them.
    Natasha Leake profile picture
    Natasha Leake
    4 years ago
    Jason Aycoth and his team were so diligent in assisting my family with our legal issues. Communication was never lacking and they were always readily available to assist my family no matter what the need was. Not only was he very professional every time we spoke, he was also friendly and personable. I will be recommending Jason Aycoth to anyone I know is in need of legal services.
    John Morris profile picture
    John Morris
    5 years ago
    Martha Massie is a fantastic lawyer. Her knowledge of the law, her thoroughness and attention to detail are superior. Most importantly, she cares about her clients which can clearly be seen by her hard work. I highly recommend Martha!
    candace james profile picture
    candace james
    5 years ago
    Chad Garrett is one amazing lawyer. He is very professional, charismatic, and gets things done no matter what. He has helped me time after time and is always in a pleasant disposition. So thankful to have met him and to have him on my side. Thank you Mr. Garrett.
    Bill Dawkins profile picture
    Bill Dawkins
    5 years ago
    Casey Robinson worked with my wife and I making a name change for our grandson. Her knowledge and ability made the task easy to complete. We would recommend her services and call on her again if needed.
    Charlie Gardener profile picture
    Charlie Gardener
    5 years ago
    I had a situation that needed to be resolved expeditiously. I call Jason Aycoth. He resolved the issue quickly. He treated me with the utmost care and respect. Everyone I spoke to in his office was courteous. I have attempted to get this matter resolved through other attorneys in the area. None came close to the experience I had with Jason and his team. I highly recommend you taking the time to hire Jason Aycoth. Jason my family and I are grateful for you! We send you the highest regards.
    Sarah S profile picture
    Sarah S
    5 years ago
    I was involved in an altercation that would forever change my life. I was referred to Jason Aycoth for help. Help wasn't all I received. Jason discussed my case with the DA. Together after reviewing my case, they took my personal record and military record into consideration. Next, a miracle was presented. Jason and the DA gave me a path to resolving my case and a path to clear my record. I've never had to use an attorney in this capacity but, rest assured, Jason Aycoth and his team earned a 5 star rating from me. I fully endorse and recommend him to any potential clients.
    Sam Walker profile picture
    Sam Walker
    5 years ago
    Excellent staff! Very knowledgeable in family and personal injury. Would highly recommend to anyone!

    Where we practice

    Our office is two minutes from the Guilford County Courthouse.

    Guilford County: Greensboro · High Point · Jamestown · Gibsonville · Summerfield · Oak Ridge · Pleasant Garden · Stokesdale · Whitsett · McLeansville · Sedalia
    Also serving: Randolph, Forsyth, Alamance, Rockingham and Davidson Counties

    Questions people ask

    Do I have to sell anything to be charged with trafficking?

    No. G.S. 90-95(h) reaches anyone who sells, manufactures, delivers, transports or possesses the threshold weight. Possession alone completes the offense, and unlike possession with intent to sell there is no intent element. The State must still prove the possession was knowing, and that is where most of these cases are actually fought.

    Does my prior record change the sentence?

    No. The class, the minimum and the maximum are fixed by weight alone, and subsection (h) applies notwithstanding any other provision of law. A first offender and someone with a long record receive the same trafficking sentence for the same weight. Prior record still matters to plea negotiation and to one narrow statutory provision, but it does not move the number.

    Can I get probation on a trafficking charge?

    Not on the face of the statute. G.S. 90-95(h)(5) says a person sentenced under this subsection may not receive a suspended sentence or be placed on probation, with two exceptions: substantial assistance, and a separate route requiring eleven findings that is limited to trafficking by possession at the lowest weight tier.

    Is the weight the drug or everything it was mixed with?

    The statute counts any mixture containing the substance. That is why a charging weight can be far higher than the amount of actual drug involved, and why what was weighed, and how, is worth contesting.

    Does substantial assistance guarantee a lower sentence?

    No. The statute says the judge may reduce the fine, go below the minimum, or suspend the term, and requires the judge to enter a finding of substantial assistance in the record. It is discretionary, there is no formula and no floor, and no conviction needs to result. It also does not require a prosecutor's motion, which is a difference from the federal system that surprises people.

    Is conspiracy to traffic a lesser charge?

    No. G.S. 90-95(i) applies the same penalties to a conspiracy conviction. Same class, same mandatory minimum and maximum, same fine as the completed offense.

    Did fentanyl sentencing change?

    Yes, for offenses committed on or after 1 December 2025. Fentanyl and carfentanil were moved out of the opium and heroin tier into a new subdivision at a higher class. At the four gram entry tier the term went from 70 to 93 months up to 90 to 120 months, with a flat $500,000 fine. The date of the offense decides which version applies to you.

    How much marijuana is trafficking in North Carolina?

    More than 10 pounds. The statute reads "in excess of 10 pounds", so exactly ten pounds does not meet it. The entry tier runs from over 10 pounds to under 50 pounds and is a Class H felony at 25 to 39 months with a fine of not less than $5,000.

    Talk to a Greensboro drug trafficking lawyer

    Free consultation. Read us the substance and the weight.

    Garrett, Walker, Aycoth & Olson, Attorneys at Law
    317 South Greene St, Greensboro, NC 27401
    (336) 379-0539 · answered live, 24 hours
    Free consultation · Se habla español

    This page explains North Carolina law in general terms as of October 2026. It is not legal advice about your case, and penalties and statutes change. Figures come from N.C.G.S. 90-95(h) and (i) and 15A-1340.13, and Session Law 2025-70. Weight thresholds and mandatory terms are stated in the statute itself.