4.9★★★★★587 Google reviews

Drive After Consuming Under 21 Lawyer in Greensboro, NC

This is not a DWI, and that distinction is worth more than most people realize. It is a separate Class 2 misdemeanor with its own rules, its own one year revocation, and one important piece of good news that almost no page explains.

Free consultation24/7 live answeringGuilford County courtsSe habla español

Tell us what happened

Age on the date, whether a test was given, and whether a DWI was also charged. Those three answers decide a lot.

CLIENT CONTACT INFO

From all of us at Garrett, Walker, Aycoth & Olson, thank you for giving us the opportunity to help you with your criminal / traffic ticket case. Please complete the form below so we can better assist you with your case. Thank you.
reCAPTCHA is required.
Please Note, Submitting Your Criminal Case DOES NOT make us Your Attorney for this Case.
In order for our law firm to represent you, we will need to be retained to represent you. You may call us at 336-379-0539 and our lawyers and staff will assist you with the hiring process. Thank you.

Sending this form does not make us your lawyer yet.

The short version

This charge is not an "offense involving impaired driving" under North Carolina law. That phrase is a defined list, and this offense is not on it. It is the most consequential fact about the charge and it is almost never explained.

Because of that, a conviction can be expunged. Impaired driving offenses are shut out of the expunction law completely. This one is not, which means the record does not have to be permanent.

But the license consequence is real and it is mandatory. The Division must revoke for one year, and whether a limited privilege is available turns on how old the driver was on the date of the offense.

What the statute actually says

G.S. 20-138.3 is short, and the wording matters more than the shorthand people use for it.

“It is unlawful for a person less than 21 years old to drive a motor vehicle on a highway or public vehicular area while consuming alcohol or at any time while he has remaining in his body any alcohol or controlled substance previously consumed, but a person less than 21 years old does not violate this section if he drives with a controlled substance in his body which was lawfully obtained and taken in therapeutically appropriate amounts.”

Notice what is not there. There is no number. No 0.08, no 0.02, not even 0.00. People call this a zero tolerance law and the statute never uses that phrase. The trigger is conduct and presence: drinking while driving, or having alcohol still in the body from earlier.

Two protections are written into the same section:

  • Odor alone is not enough. The statute says the odor of an alcoholic beverage on the driver’s breath is insufficient evidence by itself to prove the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. That is a rare thing for a statute to say.
  • Unless the driver refused. The odor protection disappears if the driver was offered a screening test or chemical analysis and refused to provide all required samples. That single sentence is why what happened at the roadside matters so much.

Screening devices must be approved by the Department of Health and Human Services and used according to its regulations, which gives a second line of attack where the device or the procedure was wrong.

Why this is not a DWI, and why it matters

North Carolina defines “offense involving impaired driving” as a closed list in G.S. 20-4.01(24a). The list contains impaired driving, commercial impaired driving, habitual impaired driving, the death and serious injury by vehicle offenses when based on impaired driving, impaired driving based murder and manslaughter, and substantially similar offenses from other states.

Driving after consuming under 21 is not on that list. The statute also says plainly that it is “not, in any circumstances, a lesser included offense of impaired driving.” It is its own thing.

Because It Is Not on That List What Follows
It does not supply the prior conviction for the aggravated death or serious injury by vehicle offenses Those require a previous conviction involving impaired driving within seven years. This conviction does not count for that.
It does not supply the prior for the longer license revocation periods that follow repeat impaired driving The revocation here is its own one year period rather than a stepping stone to a longer one.
It does not trigger the expunction bar Impaired driving offenses cannot be expunged in North Carolina. This one can. See below.

We will not oversell this. Not being a statutory impaired driving prior is not the same as harmless. The revocation is mandatory, and in at least one reported North Carolina case a prior conviction for driving after consuming while under 21 formed part of the evidence of malice in a later second degree murder prosecution arising from a driving death. It is a conviction worth avoiding. It is simply not the conviction people fear it is.

One more provision worth knowing. If someone is convicted of both this offense and an impaired driving offense from the same incident, the statute caps the aggregate punishment at the maximum for the impaired driving offense, and any minimum that applies still has to be imposed.

What you are really facing

The offense is a Class 2 misdemeanor. Misdemeanor sentencing runs on G.S. 15A-1340.23.

Prior Conviction Level Range What the Grid Authorizes
Level I
No prior convictions
1 to 30 days Community punishment only. An active sentence is not authorized at this level at all.
Level II
One to four priors
1 to 45 days Community or intermediate punishment.
Level III
Five or more priors
1 to 60 days Community, intermediate or active.

The maximum fine is $1,000, and court costs are separate.

For the great majority of people charged with this, who are young and have no record, an active sentence is not something the grid even permits. The conviction and the license are the real consequences, and both are worth work.

The license, and who can still drive

G.S. 20-13.2 is blunt: the Division must revoke the license of a person convicted of violating this section. The period is one year, and the statute says revocations under that section run concurrently with any other revocation.

Whether a limited driving privilege is available comes from the offense statute itself, and it has two conditions:

Condition Detail
Age on the date of the offense The person must have been 18, 19 or 20. Someone under 18 on that date is categorically ineligible for this privilege.
No prior conviction under this section A second conviction closes the route entirely.

Where both are met, the privilege is issued under the general limited driving privilege statute, with two of its provisions switched off: the punishment level requirement does not apply, and neither does the provision that normally invalidates a privilege where another revocation exists.

Separately, there is usually a 30 day civil revocation that starts at the arrest, because the civil revocation statute is triggered by any alcohol concentration in a driver under 21. A privilege from that revocation becomes available once ten days have run, with a substance abuse assessment and the other statutory conditions.

If the driver was under 18

This is a harder position and families deserve to hear it plainly rather than discover it later.

  • No limited driving privilege after conviction. The age condition in the statute starts at 18. There is no discretion in it.
  • The full one year revocation applies.
  • The provisional licensing system sits on top. A driver in this age band is inside the graduated licensing scheme, which has its own eligibility certificate requirements tied to school enrolllment and progress.

That combination, no privilege plus a full year plus the school eligibility overlay, is the real shape of this charge for a sixteen or seventeen year old. It is also the strongest argument for taking the charge seriously at the first court date rather than treating it as a ticket.

Was a test given at the roadside?

Whether a screening test was offered, what device was used and whether anything was refused can decide this case. Tell us what happened and we will tell you what it means.

Call (336) 379-0539Free consultation, answered 24/7

How we defend these cases

  1. Was there a lawful basis for the stop? Everything after the stop depends on it. Without reasonable suspicion the rest of the case has a problem.
  2. Is the evidence more than odor? The statute says odor alone is insufficient. If no test was given and nothing was refused, that is a statutory argument rather than a plea for leniency.
  3. Was the device approved, and was it used properly? The statute requires a DHHS approved device used in accordance with DHHS regulations. Both are checkable.
  4. Was anything actually refused? The odor protection only disappears on a refusal of all required samples. What was asked, and what was answered, matters.
  5. Is the therapeutic exception in play? The statute carves out a controlled substance lawfully obtained and taken in therapeutically appropriate amounts. Prescriptions matter here.
  6. Is a dismissal or a deferral realistic? On a first charge this is often worth more than anything else, because of what it does to the record and because of what the record does to insurance, college applications and employment.

Clearing it afterwards

This is where the charge differs most from a DWI, and it is worth planning for from day one.

If the charge is dismissed or you are found not guilty, G.S. 15A-146(a4) provides for automatic expunction of cases disposed of on or after 1 December 2021, generally within 180 to 210 days, with no petition and no fee.

If there is a conviction, G.S. 15A-145.5 is available because this is a Class 2 misdemeanor and the impaired driving exclusion does not reach it. For a single nonviolent misdemeanor the wait is three years from the conviction, or from completion of any sentence or probation, whichever is later. The petition needs affidavits of good character and a record check.

Three years is a long time at that age and it is not nothing. But it ends, which is more than can be said for a DWI conviction in North Carolina.

What a lawyer costs for this

We quote a flat fee and you get the number on the first call.

What moves it: whether a DWI was charged alongside this, whether there is a refusal in the file, whether the screening device and procedure have to be challenged, and whether we are also handling the civil revocation and a privilege application. A straightforward first charge with a clean record is a modest piece of work and we will say so.

How to choose a lawyer for this

North Carolina State Bar rules do not permit a lawyer to claim to be the best. Ask things with exact answers:

  1. “Is this an offense involving impaired driving?” The answer is no, and a lawyer who says yes has not read the definition.
  2. “Can this be expunged later?” It can, and that follows directly from the answer above.
  3. “Can I get a limited driving privilege?” It depends on age on the date of the offense and on prior convictions. There is an exact answer.
  4. “Was anything refused at the roadside?” If they do not ask you this, they have missed the most important provision in the statute.

Our DWI and traffic team

Chad D. Garrett, criminal defense attorney, Greensboro NC
Founding attorney

Chad D. Garrett

DWI, Traffic Law, Criminal Defense

Chad started the firm and defends criminal cases in state and federal court. He wrote ABC's of Traffic Law, ABC's of DWI and DWI Essentials.

  • Continuing Legal Education Instructor of the Year, North Carolina Bar Association
  • Former President, Greensboro Criminal Defense Lawyers Association
  • Board Member, Criminal Justice Section, North Carolina Bar Association

Read Chad's full profile →

What clients say

4.9 out of 5 from 587 Google reviews. A few recent ones:

Thai Nguyen profile picture
Thai Nguyen
3 weeks ago
i had a warrant on me, call this law firm Mr. Jason Aycoth, and the first time i spoke to him, he just make me feel at ease. Super friendly, down to earth and made me feel comfortable. No matter what happen i know he will fight for me with everythings he got. if you need help this is the one you want. . love this law firm. THE BEST
Autry Hinton profile picture
Autry Hinton
4 weeks ago
If I could give more stars I would! Greatest lawyer around, some might even say he’s a magician. Thank you Mr aycoth for your amazing services.
Char Frazier profile picture
Char Frazier
4 weeks ago
Fantastic service from the very first call to the end
Ven Jonn profile picture
Ven Jonn
1 month ago
We can’t thank Jason Aycoth and Samantha Hepler enough for the help with our daughter’s case. From our first call with Jason Aycoth, they were professional, honest, and clear about what to expect. They answered our questions promptly, explained every step in plain language, and were well prepared at every stage. It was a stressful time for our family, and both Jason Aycoth and Samantha Hepler were calm, compassionate, and reassuring throughout. We’re grateful the case was dismissed and highly recommend Garrett, Walker, Aycoth & Olson Law Firm to anyone who needs help.
Abdullah 65 profile picture
Abdullah 65
1 month ago
Morgan Faries was professional, helpful, and supportive throughout my case. She explained everything clearly and made me feel comfortable during a difficult time. I truly appreciate all her help and highly recommend Morgan Faries.
Judy Rocom profile picture
Judy Rocom
3 months ago
Five stars isn't enough. Patrick Bidwell is exceptional! He answered every question and concerns I had, and Patrick had told me he was going to try and get me out of court quickly and not even 15 minutes later, the case was dismissed and I was out. I truly enjoyed having him represent me and working with him. I can't recommend Attorney Patrick Bidwell enough!
tracertevin profile picture
tracertevin
4 months ago
I can't recommend Stephanie Goldsbourgh highly enough. From the very beginning, she treated me with respect, honesty, and professionalism during one of the most difficult periods of my life. I was facing very serious criminal charges, and the uncertainty was overwhelming. Stephanie never made promises she couldn't keep, but she always kept me informed, answered my questions with patience, and helped me understand every step of the legal process. What stood out most was her calm, focused approach. While I was dealing with the emotional weight of my case, she remained grounded in the facts and worked diligently on my behalf. I always felt like she genuinely cared about my future and never treated me like just another client. Thanks to her hard work and dedication, my case was ultimately dismissed. I will always be grateful for the guidance, professionalism, and integrity she showed throughout the entire process. If you're looking for an attorney who is knowledgeable, honest, compassionate, and committed to her clients, I wholeheartedly recommend Stephanie. Thank you for everything you did for me.
Evelyn Torres profile picture
Evelyn Torres
4 months ago
Morgan A. Faries is everything you could ask for in an attorney. From day one, she made us feel like we weren’t just another case. She genuinely cared about what our family was going through and always took the time to listen, understand our situation, and answer every question we had. Morgan is incredibly intelligent, knowledgeable, and knows exactly what she’s doing. At the same time, she’s compassionate, approachable, and easy to talk to. During one of the most stressful times for our family, she made us feel supported every step of the way. We always felt like she had our back and wasn’t afraid to fight for us. She kept us informed throughout the entire process, explained everything clearly, and made sure we knew what to expect. Her professionalism, attention to detail, and genuine care gave us so much peace of mind. Thanks to Morgan’s hard work and dedication, we achieved the best possible outcome for our family, and we will always be grateful for everything she did for us. Thank you, Morgan, for standing by our side when we needed it most. You truly made a difference in our lives. We wholeheartedly recommend Morgan A. Faries to anyone looking for an attorney who will genuinely care, listen, and fight tirelessly on your behalf.
Cindy Scandrett profile picture
Cindy Scandrett
5 months ago
We have used Garrett, Walker, Aycoth & Olson twice for 2 different civil litigation cases. The attorney who represented my sister-in-law, Ryan Denver, handled both cases with professionalism and respect. We were constantly updated in the process. Mr. Denver was very compassionate and caring as he negotiated a very acceptable settlement and even secured a dismissal in one of the cases. I would recommend this lawfirm without hesitation.
Maddy L profile picture
Maddy L
5 months ago
Morgan Faries is absolutely an amazing woman, and lawyer. The respect, and the time to actually listen and hear you is astonishing. She made me feel so comfortable, and heard every word of mine even though I naturally have a very soft voice. That doesn't happen very often. The silent confidence she had was admirable. She took into account what was best for me and did everything she could to have the case ruled in my favor, even if it was agreeing to a settlement that still had the avenue I needed. This avoided the mental load that was definitely going to come of the trial. She actually cared about the person I was and the situation I was going through. Her only interest was hearing me, and actually understanding. Morgan Faries is extremely intelligent especially how she holds herself. I am very grateful I had her by my side to work through the legal system. I could not have done this without her. I do not write reviews often but this law firm and attorney Morgan Faries deserves an honest review of my experience and it was everything I had hoped when I secured them for help. Thank you again, Morgan Faries and Garrett, Walker, Aycoth and Olsen, Attorneys at Law.
Karen Williams profile picture
Karen Williams
4 years ago
If you find yourself in need of an attorney I would highly recommend Hilary Hux! She and her entire team (Casey Robinson, Kristen Reese) were an absolute pleasure to work with from start to finish. They were always very attentive to my needs and always responded to any question or concern I had in a timely manner. The sincerity they displayed while handling my divorce case made a difficult time in my life more bearable knowing I had them on my side. Simply put they are a genuine group of people that do the absolute best job they can for their clients and words can't express how thankful I am to have had the experience to work with them.
Natasha Leake profile picture
Natasha Leake
5 years ago
Jason Aycoth and his team were so diligent in assisting my family with our legal issues. Communication was never lacking and they were always readily available to assist my family no matter what the need was. Not only was he very professional every time we spoke, he was also friendly and personable. I will be recommending Jason Aycoth to anyone I know is in need of legal services.
John Morris profile picture
John Morris
5 years ago
Martha Massie is a fantastic lawyer. Her knowledge of the law, her thoroughness and attention to detail are superior. Most importantly, she cares about her clients which can clearly be seen by her hard work. I highly recommend Martha!
candace james profile picture
candace james
5 years ago
Chad Garrett is one amazing lawyer. He is very professional, charismatic, and gets things done no matter what. He has helped me time after time and is always in a pleasant disposition. So thankful to have met him and to have him on my side. Thank you Mr. Garrett.
Bill Dawkins profile picture
Bill Dawkins
5 years ago
Casey Robinson worked with my wife and I making a name change for our grandson. Her knowledge and ability made the task easy to complete. We would recommend her services and call on her again if needed.
Charlie Gardener profile picture
Charlie Gardener
5 years ago
I had a situation that needed to be resolved expeditiously. I call Jason Aycoth. He resolved the issue quickly. He treated me with the utmost care and respect. Everyone I spoke to in his office was courteous. I have attempted to get this matter resolved through other attorneys in the area. None came close to the experience I had with Jason and his team. I highly recommend you taking the time to hire Jason Aycoth. Jason my family and I are grateful for you! We send you the highest regards.
Sarah S profile picture
Sarah S
5 years ago
I was involved in an altercation that would forever change my life. I was referred to Jason Aycoth for help. Help wasn't all I received. Jason discussed my case with the DA. Together after reviewing my case, they took my personal record and military record into consideration. Next, a miracle was presented. Jason and the DA gave me a path to resolving my case and a path to clear my record. I've never had to use an attorney in this capacity but, rest assured, Jason Aycoth and his team earned a 5 star rating from me. I fully endorse and recommend him to any potential clients.
Sam Walker profile picture
Sam Walker
5 years ago
Excellent staff! Very knowledgeable in family and personal injury. Would highly recommend to anyone!

Where we practice

Our office is two minutes from the Guilford County Courthouse.

Guilford County: Greensboro · High Point · Jamestown · Gibsonville · Summerfield · Oak Ridge · Pleasant Garden · Stokesdale · Whitsett · McLeansville · Sedalia
Also serving: Randolph, Forsyth, Alamance, Rockingham and Davidson Counties

Questions people ask us

How do I find the best under 21 driving after consuming lawyer in Greensboro?

No lawyer in North Carolina may claim to be the best, under State Bar rules. Ask whether this counts as an offense involving impaired driving, whether it can be expunged later, and whether a limited driving privilege is available at your age. Each has an exact answer and the answers tell you quickly whether the firm knows this charge.

Is driving after consuming under 21 a DWI?

No. It is a separate offense under G.S. 20-138.3, and the statute says it is not in any circumstances a lesser included offense of impaired driving. It is also not on the closed list of offenses involving impaired driving in G.S. 20-4.01(24a), which has real consequences for your record and for any future charge.

What is the legal limit for under 21 in NC?

The statute does not set one. It makes it unlawful to drive while consuming alcohol, or at any time while any alcohol or controlled substance previously consumed remains in the body. There is no number in the section, which is why "zero tolerance" is shorthand rather than the law.

Can they charge me just because the officer smelled alcohol?

The statute says the odor of an alcoholic beverage on the driver's breath is insufficient evidence by itself to prove the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. That protection disappears if the driver was offered a screening test or chemical analysis and refused to provide all required samples, so what happened at the roadside matters a great deal.

What is the punishment?

It is a Class 2 misdemeanor. At Prior Conviction Level I, meaning no prior convictions, the grid authorizes community punishment only, with a range of 1 to 30 days. The maximum fine is $1,000 and court costs are separate. The license consequence is usually the bigger issue.

Will I lose my license?

Yes, on conviction. G.S. 20-13.2 says the Division must revoke, and the period is one year. Those revocations run concurrently with any other revocation. There is usually also a 30 day civil revocation that starts at the arrest, because any alcohol concentration in a driver under 21 triggers it.

Can I still drive for work or school?

Possibly, through a limited driving privilege, but only if you were 18, 19 or 20 on the date of the offense and have no prior conviction under this section. Someone under 18 on that date cannot get this privilege at all. Where it is available the privilege is issued under the general limited driving privilege statute.

My child is 17. Is it different for them?

Yes, and harder. There is no limited driving privilege after conviction because the age condition starts at 18, the full one year revocation applies, and the graduated licensing system with its school eligibility certificate requirements sits on top of all of it. That combination is the strongest reason to treat the first court date seriously.

Does this count against me if I get a DWI later?

Not as a statutory impaired driving prior, because this offense is not on the list in G.S. 20-4.01(24a). It does not supply the seven year prior for the aggravated death or serious injury by vehicle offenses or for the longer repeat revocation periods. It is still a conviction on your record and North Carolina courts have allowed a prior conviction of this kind to form part of a malice showing in a later case, so it is not nothing.

Can this be expunged?

Yes, which is the single biggest practical difference from a DWI. Because the offense is not an offense involving impaired driving, the expunction bar does not reach it. For a single nonviolent misdemeanor the wait under G.S. 15A-145.5 is three years from the conviction or from completing any sentence or probation, whichever is later.

What if the charge is dismissed?

Dismissals and not guilty findings for cases disposed of on or after 1 December 2021 are expunged by operation of law, generally within 180 to 210 days, with no petition and no fee. Run a background check on yourself a few months afterwards to confirm it actually happened.

I was also charged with DWI. What happens?

They are separate offenses and the under 21 charge is not a lesser included offense of the DWI. If there is a conviction on both arising from the same incident, the statute caps the aggregate punishment at the maximum applicable to the impaired driving offense, and any minimum that applies still has to be imposed.

Talk to a Greensboro lawyer about this charge

Tell us the age on the date and whether a test was offered. Free, and there is no obligation.

Garrett, Walker, Aycoth & Olson, Attorneys at Law
317 South Greene St, Greensboro, NC 27401
(336) 379-0539 · answered live, 24 hours
Free consultation · Se habla español

This page explains North Carolina law in general terms as of October 2026. It is not legal advice about your case, and penalties and statutes change. Figures come from N.C.G.S. 20-138.3, 20-4.01, 20-13.2, 20-11, 20-16.5, 20-179.3, 15A-1340.23, 15A-145.5 and 15A-146.